Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde?
I dag er Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde? et emne, der vækker stor interesse og debat i samfundet. Med fremskridt inden for teknologi og globalisering er Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde? blevet en afgørende del af folks dagligdag. Uanset om det er på arbejdspladsen, den personlige eller den akademiske sfære, har Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde? formået at påvirke alle aspekter af det moderne liv markant. Derfor er det vigtigt at analysere detaljeret og objektivt, hvilken indflydelse Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde? har på vores dagligdag, samt dens implikationer på kort, mellemlang og lang sigt. I denne artikel vil forskellige perspektiver og meninger om Skabelon:Upålidelig kilde? blive udforsket, for at give læseren en bred og komplet vision af dette emne, der er så relevant i dag.
Usage
This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:
- It was actually written by Francis Bacon.[upålidelig kilde?]
Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Kategori:Artikler, der mangler pålidelige kilder.
Place this template inline, {{Upålidelig kilde?|dato=april 2025}} following the questionable claim (and any punctuation attached to it). The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:
- Potentially controversial statement.
<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Upålidelig kilde?|date=april 2025}}Next sentence.
Parameters
The template has the following optional parameters:
- date: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example:
{{Upålidelig kilde?|date=april 2025}} - reason: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per Wikipedia:RS. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example:
{{Upålidelig kilde?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=april 2025}} - sure or certain: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a
|reason=parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example:{{Upålidelig kilde?|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=april 2025}}. NOTE: This parameter has an alias,|failed=.
When to use and not use this template
This template should be used to express doubt about the credibility of a source.
For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{Kilder}} or {{Kilder|dette afsnit}} (the latter for sections), respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.
Redirects
The following may presently be used as shortcuts and aliases for this template:
- {{Pålidelig kilde?}}
- {{Upålidelig kilde}}
- {{rs}}
- {{rs?}}
- {{Unreliable source?}}
See also
Inline templates
{{Bedre kilde}}, an alternative to{{Upålidelig kilde?|certain=y}}; especially useful for tagging sources that are low-quality but not necessarily wrong{{Tvivlsomt}}, for questionable claims that seem unlikely to be properly sourceable
TemplateData
Upålidelig kilde?
Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
| Parameter | Beskrivelse | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reason | reason | Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip | Streng | valgfri |
| Certain? | certain sure failed | If set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable
| Boolesk | valgfri |
| Month and year | date | Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'
| Streng | foreslået |